Experimental Session #1: The Legend of Zelda... and Sophie

Crazy to think we finally did a proper Make Them Awesome project after almost two and a half years. Once we got the ball rolling, you couldn’t tell we hadn’t worked together in that long.

Though we decided to start getting back to working together in a different way.

Experimental Sessions?

Once my life got to a point where we could consider doing projects again, we started talking about what exactly we should work on. We talked through what bits we had been able to do within the last 2.5 years, and how some things worked and some didn’t. As we discussed the projects that did work, there was something pointed out to WHY they worked so well: overall simplicity. There weren't super crazy lighting setups, set building, or really defined ideas for shots. We basically went in with a loose set of ideas, and explored to see what we would get.

So instead of trying to tackle anything off of our existing project list, it was suggested that we have some sessions that were along the same lines. Just go somewhere and do something with barely any structure and see what we get. Considering I hadn’t shot anything since July of last year I thought it was a great idea. I did need to get reacclimated to shooting after not being able to for so long. Going in and not expecting a particular result would certainly help with that.

Character Selection and Team Location Scouting

The overall idea was “cute springtime location pics”. Tacocat suggested we revisit Mckinney Falls for this since it did have a great mix of fields, forest areas, walking paths, and water features. Though she and I decided to go “rescout” the park together. Which worked out well since 1) we hadn’t been there since late 2018, and 2) Tacocat was able to call out spots and sight lines she thought would work well for the characters we planned to cover.

Photo by Tacocat

The initial characters we were going to shoot were Tacocat as Sophie from Howl’s Moving Castle and Allybelle as Princess Zelda. Though Allybelle would actually have two versions of Zelda: one in Ally’s Zelda inspired wedding dress (that Tacocat made), and her ceremonial outfit from Breath of the Wild that she had purchased from Miccostumes. With the water features we thought we could possibly get some photos inspired by one particular cutscene in the game.

As Tacocat and I were scouting she said to me “Hey, why not have Ryan as Link?” Ryan is Ally’s husband, and since they had a Zelda themed wedding, he conveniently had a Link costume that would fit this idea. I was like “Hey, see if he can show up.” Thankfully he was able to.

Photo by Allybelle

Gear Choices

In keeping with the simplicity of the project idea I used only one light the whole day. Since it was potentially going to be sunny out I brought along the Godox AD600B. That way if I needed a lot of power for a possible shot I knew it could handle it.

For lens choices I used primarily the Fuji 50mm f/2 for the bulk of the session. Because a lot of the potential spots we would shoot at were so large I was actually able to back up far enough away for full length shots of anyone. Plus with that focal length we would be able to get some good background separation.

Photo by Tacocat

Texas Weather: More Unpredictable Than Usual

Let’s just say trying to plan around Texas weather is a balancing act. Though the day we chose to shoot was even more RNG than normal. When we set up the idea we chose to shoot Easter Sunday. At the time we did that it was going to be upper 70s and partly cloudy. Which would make for great shooting weather and provide for great light. Then as the day grew closer the forecast changed to lower 90s and mostly sunny. Then it went back to upper 70s. Then chances of rain. The day before, the possibility of precipitation went to 0%.

Turns out it DID rain early that morning. As long as it didn’t rain during the day we were fine. Though for the first part of the shoot it was really overcast. I'm not a fan of shooting in that situation, mostly just because it kills all the depth out of the background. And you can only do so much in the editing stage to try to bring it back and make it look normal.

Thankfully the sun did come out for a while and really helped add some dimension to the background. Then it became somewhat overcast again. Ergh.

Photo by Ryan Hallick

While we prepared to shoot Zelda’s ceremonial outfit I got a notification on my phone that a severe thunderstorm watch had just been issued for the central Texas area. When I saw that I was just like “Fuck, really?” Considering we were planning on doing water shots I was less than thrilled with the timing. We were glad that no storms appeared during this part of the session. In fact the storms never did show up and they ended up canceling the watch early.

Texas weather, please be less random next time.

The Shoot

Photo by Luis Guevara

Let’s just say you couldn’t tell it had been so long since we had worked together. It was our usual free exchange of shot/pose ideas, wig moming, and trolling. Lots of trolling. I mean Luis is part of the team after all. Though none of us realized the power of Ryan and Luis team trolling until that day. Mistakes may have been made in that regard.

The overall simplicity of the session idea really helped us just flow creatively. And we were able to get some good pics because of that.

There is an amusing bit that I don’t think many cosplayers or photographers can say they’ve experienced: getting nibbled on by fish. While we were shooting ceremonial Zelda at the upper falls while I was in the water shooting Ally on the rocks on the opposite shore I kept thinking something was brushing up against my legs. But when I’d go to look I’d see nothing. After Ally got in the water and was there for a while she said, “The fish are biting at my legs and it’s annoying me.” Tacocat mentioned she felt the same thing.

Apparently MTA has a flavor.

Photo by Ryan Hallick

Photo by Ryan Hallick

Final Thoughts

It was great for us just to get back together again and do SOMETHING. While not all of MTA was there (Mermaid Child couldn’t make this session) it was certainly 100% us.

We do have plans for two more experimental sessions: one in the studio and one outdoors. The characters and overall ideas have been determined. But we're going to approach them with the same frame of mind as we did this session.

What will those specific sessions involve? You’ll just have to wait and see. 

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

We're All More Than Just Content Creators

There’s been a term I’ve been hearing more and more creatives in the spaces we run in use to describe themselves: “content creator”. Even from people who work we admire and have learned from. To us they’re people who inspire, educate, and entertain us. Both in photography and cosplay.

As I kept seeing that term come up my mind kept coming back to one question: why those words exactly?

What Is A “Content Creator” In The First Place?

In my head I had some understanding of what the term could mean. But I wasn’t sure if I’d be missing something if I tried to write out what I thought the definition was. Thankfully there were other places online that could help with that.

From Wikipedia let’s look at the meaning of ‘content creation’:

Content creation is the contribution of information to any media and most especially to digital media for an end-user/audience in specific contexts. Content is "something that is to be expressed through some medium as speech, writing or any of various arts" for self-expression, distribution, marketing and/or publication. Typical forms of content creation include maintaining and updating websites, blogging, article writing, photography, videography, online commentary, the maintenance of social media accounts, and editing and distribution of digital media. A Pew survey described content creation as the creation of "the material people contribute to the online world."

Oddly enough Adobe actually had a really good definition of ‘content creator’:

A content creator is someone who creates entertaining or educational material to be expressed through any medium or channel. Content creation especially pertains to digital content, since that’s where the majority of content is consumed.

Okay, so we now have a better understanding of the term then what I could have possibly written out on my own. But when we consider these two pieces of info it’s a pretty wide umbrella. There will be bits and pieces of each of these I’ll reference throughout this article.

Thinking About The Tools We Work With

By ‘tools’ I mean platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Twitch, YouTube, TikTok, etc. And for those of us that have our own websites then search engines will play into this as well.

We all know that these platforms want us to be as active as possible. Not only just from the reach perspective but also for any possible monetization options. I’ve known a number of creators who have been able to take advantage of this on multiple platforms, and I’m glad they were able to achieve that.

Though with the information given to us by these platforms… can we truly say why people are there?

With the way data is given to us now we can’t fully figure out why exactly people decided to interact with anything offered. We have no way of knowing if it was an educational, amusing, or other emotional level of response. Also consider that a lot of these services don’t have a good way to dump out the data to truly compare and contrast (well, without a lot of manual work or investment in really expensive tools anyway). Then there’s the whole content analysis bit with regards to comments to think about.

I have to wonder how this data (or lack thereof) influences the decisions a creator makes. Or how they view themselves and their work.

What Is Being Put Out There

There are certainly photographers who are really good about giving solid creative educational info along with photos that evoke an emotional response out of the viewer. These are really the kind of people I will most likely follow. Though it also doesn’t hurt if they’re entertaining in some other way.

After that things start to get a bit cloudy. With photography there’s certainly a lot of things we need to think about from technical perspectives. Whether it be in the gear used or the post-production process. Now there are some people out there that are really good about providing creative applications within that space. Though for some reason that isn’t always the case, especially when it comes to talking about new equipment.

Following that there is this weird space of “entertainment in education wrapping”. Those videos you come across where the title makes it seem like it could contain some new knowledge. Once you view it the educational portion of the video is very small where the rest is completely irrelevant to the subject. Or the presentation of the supposed educational parts is questionable (i.e., the “easy photo hack” videos).

And then there are the rest. The ones that try to get your attention to help “feed the machines”. You know, the things offered that initially seem to offer some sort of wisdom but don’t really deliver anything meaningful. There’s been a number of articles and videos I’ve seen where I’ve been like “Okay, I’m not exactly sure why you decided to put this together and share it?”

When we consider that…

1: The audience for those wanting to learn about photography is rather large

2: How the various platforms we all use all rely on consistent and regular updating

I get why the quality of material runs the gamut. It’s really why I spend more time paying attention to the kinds of people I described in the first paragraph. They are definitely bringing something to their audiences in multiple ways.

So why is the descriptor they may choose to describe themselves “content creator”?

Rethinking The Words

In a way I can see why someone may choose to describe themselves that way. It is a term that very much helps in the “elevator pitch” type of conversation. Though I have to wonder how those who use it may follow up to provide context for what exactly they do. Then there is also the consideration of how a potential recipient understands those words.

To be completely candid… I’m not fond of the wording. Mostly because I feel like it’s lacking. Which I’ll go into here in a bit.

I posted a question to my personal Facebook account…

Does anyone else dislike the term "content creator"?

A lot of my friends are creative people. Mostly musicians but also in other disciplines as well. I wasn’t sure how much reaction I’d get with this since I’ve tossed out “larger creative world” questions in the past and have not gotten much.

This actually got quite a bit of commentary.

Does content or content creator mean anything on their own at this point?

Given the definitions provided earlier this is a good question.

Only when it’s used in place of “artist”/“musician”/“DJ”/etc. Just ‘cause they’re Instagramming, or posting on TikTok, doesn’t mean there isn’t artistry going on.

Yes. It was a sort of useful catch all term for media folks making art of some kind, but now it just means someone who posts things on social media, which is kind of meaningless.

It was interesting how these two comments brought up the art in anything presented without any sort of prompting. Though these were similar to thoughts I had when pondering the words.

Yes. I fucking hate it.

I still find it a bit creepy and dystopian.

It’s literally better than “Influencer”.

I dislike it less than influencer.

Haha I was just thinking earlier today about how long that and “influencer” have actually been around. They are so ubiquitous now..

I must admit I was amused how the term “influencer” got brought up a few times. I will admit I also certainly have issues with that word.

Now this last comment was really interesting. This was a friend of mine who I’ve known since my freshman year of high school (1992… hold on, lemme take some ibuprofen for my back). They’ve stated for years that they “don’t have a creative bone in their body”. For someone like that to say this… I think it has some power.

IMHO 'Content Creator' means nothing. It's come to be a term that people can use to make themselves feel legitimate without real effort. I have a ton of respect for those people who 'do' the thing, being as I am not one of them. The artist that makes art. The photographers, models, filmmakers, writers, musicians, etc... that put themselves and their work out there to mean something. Hollow work, or meaningless content, for the sake of likes, disturbs me greatly.

In a lot of ways that was why I phrased the question the way I did. And it really hinged on one specific word:

Content.

Right now even with all of the technological advancements we’ve had, automation really has no true understanding of why things are presented and reacted upon. But the data we’re currently collecting makes us think we can gain some sort of knowledge with this information. I have to question that. Also with how the current platforms have the constant need of new data it’s so much that maybe us as creatives end up thinking about how to more easily describe the work we’re putting out there. And maybe by extension how we think of ourselves.

If we think about the word “content” it just implies something that exists without any implications of the value something presented might have. Consume it and move on. With the number of creative people I’ve run into over the years I’ve learned that there are those who want to offer more than just the consumption of anything. To me and others they’re putting out more than just “content”.

Now do I have a replacement term to offer here? No I don’t. And it’s really because I can’t speak to the various skills and experiences of anyone possibly reading this. Nor do I know their understanding of their own work. 

For those who are truly trying to put in the effort in their work and have it have meaning for their people… how could we possibly highlight that effort in the way we describe ourselves?